Throughout
the duration of the Belle Project, quantitative and qualitative
evaluation tools will be used to establish the feasibility
and acceptability of the broadband-enabled learning environments.
These results will have an impact on both technology and
learning as they are fed back into the teaching and learning
development process.
The continuing cooperation, communication and commitment
of all of the partners are necessary to the success of
the Belle Project. These evaluative steps are presented
in that spirit of collaboration.
Evaluation
Methods:
1. Logs:
a) System
Log for the Client Learning Environment (CLE)
b) Activity
Log for the Client Learning Environment (CLE)
c) Discussion
Log between partner institutions and Netera Alliance
2. Market
Research Study
3. Evaluation
Questions
4.Pilot and Evaluative Projects
The Core Evaluation Team will coordinate evaluation
activities with the appropriate sub-groups at each stage
of the evaluation process.
Core Evaluation Team — Stanley Varnhagen, Myrna Sears,
Terry Anderson, Jack Morin, Bill Fricker, Janelle Ring,
Cathy King, Lisa Willemse, Doug MacLeod, Penny Jennett,
Tim Buell.
Evaluation Sub-Groups:
1.
Testbed
Infrastructure — Doug MacLeod, Doug Bowman, Tim Daigle
2.
Conceptual
Infrastructure — Trevor Doerkson, Mike Magee, Norm Friesen
3.
Learning
Content —
a)
Peer
Review: Tim Buell, Katy Campbell, Jack Morin
b)
Site
Activities and Uses: Jack Morin, Bill Fricker, Janelle
Ring, Cathy King, Lisa Willemse
4.
Communications
and Training — Janelle Ring, Cathy King, Lisa Willemse
|
|
|
|
|
